Foundry Technology Gross Margin Factor ETF
ETF Foundry Research (hypothetical) · rebalanced monthly
Every other metric on this page is the long-shortstrategy, which needs a short book. This fund is the long leg alone, so these are the figures for what it actually holds. The bottom-bucket number is that basket’s own return — not short P&L.
Hypothetical growth of $1 — long-short backtest
Gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs · not investor results
Holdings
Every constituent of the long leg — sort, search or filter by sector
| Ticker | Company | Sector | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1PLTR | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | Technology | $317.36B | 18.38% |
2APP | APPLOVIN CORP | Technology | $142.62B | 8.26% |
3CRM | SALESFORCE INC | Technology | $139.86B | 8.10% |
4FTNT | FORTINET INC | Technology | $118.40B | 6.86% |
5NOW | SERVICENOW INC | Technology | $106.44B | 6.16% |
6ADBE | ADOBE INC | Technology | $94.31B | 5.46% |
7DDOG | DATADOG INC | Technology | $92.08B | 5.33% |
8CDNS | CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $91.05B | 5.27% |
9INTU | INTUIT INC | Technology | $79.62B | 4.61% |
10ADSK | AUTODESK INC | Technology | $46.07B | 2.67% |
11FICO | FAIR ISAAC CORP | Technology | $29.15B | 1.69% |
12ZM | ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS INC | Technology | $26.72B | 1.55% |
13OKTA | OKTA INC | Technology | $25.96B | 1.50% |
14VRSN | VERISIGN INC | Technology | $25.27B | 1.46% |
15ZS | ZSCALER INC | Technology | $24.25B | 1.40% |
16CPAY | CORPAY INC | Technology | $23.91B | 1.38% |
17TEAM | ATLASSIAN CORP | Technology | $23.67B | 1.37% |
18FFIV | F5 INC | Technology | $23.08B | 1.34% |
19IOT | SAMSARA INC | Technology | $22.33B | 1.29% |
20RBRK | RUBRIK INC | Technology | $16.25B | 0.94% |
21GEN | GEN DIGITAL INC | Technology | $16.11B | 0.93% |
22NTNX | NUTANIX INC | Technology | $14.89B | 0.86% |
23PTC | PTC INC | Technology | $14.37B | 0.83% |
24DT | DYNATRACE INC | Technology | $12.94B | 0.75% |
25FIG | FIGMA INC | Technology | $12.65B | 0.73% |
26HUBS | HUBSPOT INC | Technology | $11.49B | 0.67% |
27RMBS | RAMBUS INC | Technology | $10.97B | 0.64% |
28FROG | JFROG LTD | Technology | $10.72B | 0.62% |
29DOCU | DOCUSIGN INC | Technology | $10.07B | 0.58% |
30BSY | BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $9.82B | 0.57% |
31TTD | TRADE DESK INC | Technology | $8.74B | 0.51% |
32CHYM | CHIME FINANCIAL INC | Technology | $8.51B | 0.49% |
33DBX | DROPBOX INC | Technology | $7.14B | 0.41% |
34PAYC | PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC | Technology | $7.05B | 0.41% |
35PCOR | PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES INC | Technology | $6.93B | 0.40% |
36PATH | UIPATH INC | Technology | $6.30B | 0.36% |
37CVLT | COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $6.10B | 0.35% |
38QLYS | QUALYS INC | Technology | $5.61B | 0.33% |
39DAVE | DAVE INC | Technology | $5.60B | 0.32% |
40GTLB | GITLAB INC | Technology | $5.53B | 0.32% |
41VRNS | VARONIS SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $5.46B | 0.32% |
42BILL | BILL HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $4.45B | 0.26% |
43TENB | TENABLE HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $4.40B | 0.25% |
44LIF | LIFE360 INC | Technology | $4.36B | 0.25% |
45BOX | BOX INC | Technology | $4.22B | 0.24% |
46CLBT | CELLEBRITE DI LTD | Technology | $3.81B | 0.22% |
47WK | WORKIVA INC | Technology | $3.21B | 0.19% |
48FRSH | FRESHWORKS INC | Technology | $3.01B | 0.17% |
49XNDU | XANADU QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES LTD | Technology | $2.98B | 0.17% |
50NTCT | NETSCOUT SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $2.95B | 0.17% |
51ADEA | ADEIA INC | Technology | $2.80B | 0.16% |
52ATEN | A10 NETWORKS INC | Technology | $2.59B | 0.15% |
53EVCM | EVERCOMMERCE INC | Technology | $2.13B | 0.12% |
54ASAN | ASANA INC | Technology | $1.77B | 0.10% |
55DV | DOUBLEVERIFY HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $1.75B | 0.10% |
56PRGS | PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP | Technology | $1.66B | 0.10% |
57BRUN | BOOST RUN INC | Technology | $1.50B | 0.09% |
58AIP | ARTERIS INC | Technology | $1.43B | 0.08% |
59WLTH | WEALTHFRONT CORP | Technology | $1.38B | 0.08% |
60SECZ | SECURITIZE CORP | Technology | $1.11B | 0.06% |
61CEVA | CEVA INC | Technology | $1.06B | 0.06% |
62RDVT | RED VIOLET INC | Technology | $920M | 0.05% |
63MITK | MITEK SYSTEMS INC | Technology | $857M | 0.05% |
64DJCO | DAILY JOURNAL CORP | Technology | $817M | 0.05% |
65PD | PAGERDUTY INC | Technology | $794M | 0.05% |
66DSP | VIANT TECHNOLOGY INC | Technology | $754M | 0.04% |
67IBTA | IBOTTA INC | Technology | $734M | 0.04% |
68CCSI | CONSENSUS CLOUD SOLUTIONS INC | Technology | $689M | 0.04% |
69MNTN | MNTN INC | Technology | $661M | 0.04% |
70SPT | SPROUT SOCIAL INC | Technology | $518M | 0.03% |
71NVEC | NVE CORP | Technology | $418M | 0.02% |
72CRNC | CERENCE INC | Technology | $390M | 0.02% |
73MKTW | MARKETWISE INC | Technology | $314M | 0.02% |
74SVCO | SILVACO GROUP INC | Technology | $260M | 0.02% |
75TRAK | REPOSITRAK INC | Technology | $160M | 0.01% |
76EXOD | EXODUS MOVEMENT INC | Technology | $152M | 0.01% |
77FIRY | FIRY INC | Technology | $130M | 0.01% |
78AMCI | AMC ROBOTICS CORP | Technology | $114M | 0.01% |
79AEYE | AUDIOEYE INC | Technology | $82M | 0.00% |
80BNAI | BRAND ENGAGEMENT NETWORK INC | Technology | $76M | 0.00% |
81ACFN | ACORN ENERGY INC | Technology | $51M | 0.00% |
Full long-leg book as of July 2026 · cap-weighted · total market cap $1.73T. Hypothetical model holdings — not a registered fund’s portfolio.
Sector Breakdown
Portfolio Style
Size × value map of the long-leg book
Share of long-leg capital by market cap × book-to-market, using terciles of the 421-name universe at July 2026. Rows: Large ≥ $8.9B, Small < $1.9B. Columns: Value ≥ 0.63, Growth < 0.38 B/M. The dot marks the capital-weighted centroid of the book — 96% toward Large, 70% toward Growth. +3% unclassified (8 missing size/value). Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not realized P&L.
Capital-weighted centroid of the long leg, December 1998 → July 2026; the right-hand end is the same value as the box’s dot. 81 names now. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not P&L.
Constraint checks
How this book measures against the concentration and liquidity rules — as implemented here
These are UNCONSTRAINED factor sleeves: the construction pipeline sorts on a signal and cap-weights the top bucket, applying no issuer cap, no industry cap and no liquidity screen beyond the universe filter. A failing test therefore reports a constraint that was never applied during construction — it is not a defect in the strategy and not an error in the data. The same signal can be solved subject to these constraints.
7 independent checks plus 1 arithmetically implied by another check (RIC / IRC 851(b)(3)(A) 50% bucket), which is reported separately so the tally cannot overstate scrutiny.
1 of 7 checks could not be tested. Those are neither passes nor failures — they are gaps in what the data can answer, and they are excluded from the passed count above rather than folded into it.
Engineering approximation of the cited rules for a DRAFT / HYPOTHETICAL model portfolio that is not a registered fund. This reports whether the portfolio passes the stated test AS IMPLEMENTED HERE; it is not a compliance opinion and is not a statement that any fund is compliant. Real filings need securities counsel.
No verdict sits within 1.0pp of its limit.
Data version — panel=20260719T025334 rows=2239262 asof=202607 issuers=20260719T014536 rates=20260804T224700
Measured on the 2026-07 formation date across 81 holdings (cap-weighted). A different formation date can produce different verdicts.
Derivatives risk (Rule 18f-4)
Whether this long-only book is subject to the VaR tests at all
This assessment describes the long-only book this fund holds — the top bucket only.
This fund QUALIFIES for the limited-derivatives-user exception, so it is excepted from the VaR tests; the ratio below is informational, not the operative limit.
Rule 18f-4(c)(4): a fund whose derivatives exposure (gross notional, including the value of assets sold short) is <= 10% of net assets is excepted from the VaR tests and the full derivatives risk management program.
No confidence interval: this follows from portfolio construction, not from an estimate.
Rule 18f-4(c)(2)(i): fund VaR at 99% over 20 trading days must not exceed 200% of the designated reference portfolio's VaR on the same basis.
Informational — does not governThis fund is excepted from the VaR tests, so the ratio below is context rather than the operative limit. It is shown because it is still a description of the book’s risk, not because it decides anything.
historical method · 331 monthly observations · about 3.3 in the 99% tail · paired percentile bootstrap over months
The estimators agree, which is mild evidence the number isn’t an artefact of one method.
Engineering approximation of SEC Rule 18f-4 for research display. Not a compliance opinion and not a determination that any fund is compliant. Hypothetical model portfolio, not a registered fund.
The research long-short construction behind this factor does not qualify for this exception — a dollar-neutral book counts its full short notional, which is 100% of net assets against a 10% threshold. This product sidesteps that by holding the long leg alone, which is also why the long-leg Sharpe is reported separately throughout the site.
See the long-short verdict on the factor page →Since publication
Did the edge survive the paper coming out?
Publication date unknown. We don’t have a source year for this signal, so we can’t split its record into before and since publication. That’s a gap in our reference data — not a statement about how the factor performed.
Split at January of the year after the factor was published. The post-publication stretch IS genuinely out-of-sample relative to the original study -- the predictor was public by then -- so it speaks to whether the effect survived being known. Nothing is fitted here, so this is performance SINCE PUBLICATION, not validation of a model. Note the 'pre' side is our data before publication (our panel starts ~1999), NOT the study's original in-sample period, which usually ran decades earlier; a decay figure compares before-vs-after within our sample and is not a comparison against the published result.
Consistency across eras
Is this record broadly durable, or one regime?
3-year rolling windows, stepping 1 year (26 windows). Dispersion is the spread of window Sharpes — higher means the record depends more on which era you look at.
Rules-based factors fit no parameters, so these windows are not out-of-sample tests and do not validate a fitted model. They show whether the factor's record is consistent across eras or driven by one regime.
Returns
Long leg is what this fund holds — long-short is shown for reference
| Period | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 1 yearcum. | -20.2% | -67.7% |
| 3 yearsp.a. | 1.2% | -30.9% |
| 5 yearsp.a. | -1.0% | -18.5% |
| 10 yearsp.a. | 13.5% | -7.5% |
| Since inceptionp.a. | 7.4% | -0.9% |
| Year | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 20267 mo | -18.0% | -58.5% |
| 2025 | 4.7% | -18.3% |
| 2024 | 10.9% | -3.1% |
| 2023 | 54.1% | 16.8% |
| 2022 | -36.2% | -10.0% |
| 2021 | 18.2% | 8.2% |
| 2020 | 51.4% | 13.4% |
| 2019 | 32.1% | -3.6% |
| 2018 | 17.8% | 24.2% |
| 2017 | 37.1% | 7.9% |
| 2016 | 9.2% | -14.2% |
| 2015 | -3.7% | 5.3% |
| 2014 | 20.7% | -4.8% |
| 2013 | 30.3% | -26.8% |
| 2012 | 16.0% | 25.2% |
| 2011 | -10.8% | 11.2% |
| 2010 | 16.9% | 23.3% |
| 2009 | 50.3% | -1.0% |
| 2008 | -38.6% | 7.5% |
| 2007 | 17.1% | 7.7% |
| 2006 | 12.9% | -5.0% |
| 2005 | -3.5% | -9.9% |
| 2004 | 5.1% | -3.9% |
| 2003 | 30.7% | -11.7% |
| 2002 | -26.4% | 17.3% |
| 2001 | -14.6% | -3.5% |
| 2000 | -50.5% | -0.4% |
| 1999 | 98.4% | 40.8% |
Long leg = the top bucket this fund holds; long-short additionally shorts the bottom bucket and is not achievable in a long-only vehicle. Trailing figures run through July 2026: 1 year is a plain cumulative 12-month return (cum.), 3 years and longer are annualised (p.a.). Years marked with a month count are partial. These match the fact sheet’s tables by construction. Hypothetical backtest, gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs — not investor results.
Fund Facts
Methodology
The Foundry Technology Gross Margin Factor ETF tracks a rules-based model that ranks Technology common stocks each month by a Gross Margin signal and holds the top quintile with the highest values. Signals are computed from point-in-time Sharadar fundamentals and total-return prices. The portfolio reconstitutes monthly and is cap-weighted within the long leg.
This is a hypothetical model portfolio for research display only — not a registered fund, not an offer, and not investment advice.
Documents (draft — hypothetical)
Auto-generated from the model’s metrics and current holdings. Every document is labeled DRAFT / hypothetical.
Objective, fees, strategy, and key risks.
Full strategy, model methodology, and risks.
Policies, construction, and governance.
One-page snapshot with top holdings.
Full current constituent list.
DRAFT — HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PORTFOLIO — NOT A REGISTERED FUND, NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.