Foundry Technology Leverage Factor ETF
ETF Foundry Research (hypothetical) · rebalanced monthly
Every other metric on this page is the long-shortstrategy, which needs a short book. This fund is the long leg alone, so these are the figures for what it actually holds. The bottom-bucket number is that basket’s own return — not short P&L.
Hypothetical growth of $1 — long-short backtest
Gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs · not investor results
Holdings
Every constituent of the long leg — sort, search or filter by sector
| Ticker | Company | Sector | Market cap | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1ORCL | ORACLE CORP | Technology | $364.12B | 32.89% |
2IBM | INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | Technology | $199.89B | 18.06% |
3HPE | HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO | Technology | $60.67B | 5.48% |
4CRWV | COREWEAVE INC | Technology | $39.94B | 3.61% |
5JBL | JABIL INC | Technology | $31.54B | 2.85% |
6FISV | FISERV INC | Technology | $27.00B | 2.44% |
7CPAY | CORPAY INC | Technology | $23.91B | 2.16% |
8HPQ | HP INC | Technology | $22.72B | 2.05% |
9FIS | FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICES INC | Technology | $21.66B | 1.96% |
10SNX | TD SYNNEX CORP | Technology | $19.40B | 1.75% |
11CDW | CDW CORP | Technology | $17.02B | 1.54% |
12SSNC | SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $16.75B | 1.51% |
13GEN | GEN DIGITAL INC | Technology | $16.11B | 1.46% |
14SMCI | SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC | Technology | $14.54B | 1.31% |
15LDOS | LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $13.39B | 1.21% |
16GDDY | GODADDY INC | Technology | $12.49B | 1.13% |
17SANM | SANMINA CORP | Technology | $10.57B | 0.96% |
18ARW | ARROW ELECTRONICS INC | Technology | $10.56B | 0.95% |
19QXO | QXO INC | Technology | $10.44B | 0.94% |
20CACI | CACI INTERNATIONAL INC | Technology | $10.20B | 0.92% |
21VSAT | VIASAT INC | Technology | $9.76B | 0.88% |
22IT | GARTNER INC | Technology | $9.39B | 0.85% |
23DBX | DROPBOX INC | Technology | $7.14B | 0.65% |
24AVT | AVNET INC | Technology | $7.03B | 0.63% |
25INGM | INGRAM MICRO HOLDING CORP | Technology | $6.78B | 0.61% |
26PCTY | PAYLOCITY HOLDING CORP | Technology | $6.75B | 0.61% |
27CORZ | CORE SCIENTIFIC INC | Technology | $6.66B | 0.60% |
28ST | SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC | Technology | $6.55B | 0.59% |
29LYFT | LYFT INC | Technology | $5.89B | 0.53% |
30WEX | WEX INC | Technology | $5.70B | 0.51% |
31OTEX | OPEN TEXT CORP | Technology | $5.65B | 0.51% |
32G | GENPACT LTD | Technology | $5.24B | 0.47% |
33GBTG | GLOBAL BUSINESS TRAVEL GROUP INC | Technology | $4.91B | 0.44% |
34SAIC | SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP | Technology | $4.88B | 0.44% |
35BILL | BILL HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $4.45B | 0.40% |
36VNT | VONTIER CORP | Technology | $4.25B | 0.38% |
37FOUR | SHIFT4 PAYMENTS INC | Technology | $3.99B | 0.36% |
38ITRI | ITRON INC | Technology | $3.81B | 0.34% |
39NATL | NCR ATLEOS CORP | Technology | $3.50B | 0.32% |
40NSIT | INSIGHT ENTERPRISES INC | Technology | $3.48B | 0.31% |
41CSQR | CSQUARE INC | Technology | $3.16B | 0.29% |
42EEFT | EURONET WORLDWIDE INC | Technology | $3.10B | 0.28% |
43DBD | DIEBOLD NIXDORF INC | Technology | $2.97B | 0.27% |
44RUN | SUNRUN INC | Technology | $2.83B | 0.26% |
45KD | KYNDRYL HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $2.67B | 0.24% |
46PAYO | PAYONEER GLOBAL INC | Technology | $2.38B | 0.22% |
47EVTC | EVERTEC INC | Technology | $1.87B | 0.17% |
48BL | BLACKLINE INC | Technology | $1.78B | 0.16% |
49LIME | NEUTRON HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $1.68B | 0.15% |
50PRGS | PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORP | Technology | $1.66B | 0.15% |
51DXC | DXC TECHNOLOGY CO | Technology | $1.55B | 0.14% |
52CNXC | CONCENTRIX CORP | Technology | $1.49B | 0.13% |
53BLKB | BLACKBAUD INC | Technology | $1.49B | 0.13% |
54WOLF | WOLFSPEED INC | Technology | $1.44B | 0.13% |
55WLTH | WEALTHFRONT CORP | Technology | $1.38B | 0.12% |
56UPBD | UPBOUND GROUP INC | Technology | $1.29B | 0.12% |
57VYX | NCR VOYIX CORP | Technology | $1.13B | 0.10% |
58SCSC | SCANSOURCE INC | Technology | $1.11B | 0.10% |
59APPS | DIGITAL TURBINE INC | Technology | $1.01B | 0.09% |
60ADTN | ADTRAN HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $944M | 0.09% |
61ARRY | ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES INC | Technology | $940M | 0.08% |
62RPD | RAPID7 INC | Technology | $815M | 0.07% |
63PD | PAGERDUTY INC | Technology | $794M | 0.07% |
64EFOR | EVERFORTH INC | Technology | $768M | 0.07% |
65CCSI | CONSENSUS CLOUD SOLUTIONS INC | Technology | $689M | 0.06% |
66PAR | PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP | Technology | $674M | 0.06% |
67PUBM | PUBMATIC INC | Technology | $591M | 0.05% |
68ALIT | ALIGHT INC | Technology | $584M | 0.05% |
69PRTH | PRIORITY TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS INC | Technology | $551M | 0.05% |
70YEXT | YEXT INC | Technology | $535M | 0.05% |
71TASK | TASKUS INC | Technology | $534M | 0.05% |
72MEI | METHODE ELECTRONICS INC | Technology | $532M | 0.05% |
73CLMB | CLIMB GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INC | Technology | $482M | 0.04% |
74QMCO | QUANTUM CORP | Technology | $419M | 0.04% |
75IMXI | INTERNATIONAL MONEY EXPRESS INC | Technology | $404M | 0.04% |
76CRNC | CERENCE INC | Technology | $390M | 0.04% |
77MKTW | MARKETWISE INC | Technology | $314M | 0.03% |
78AVNW | AVIAT NETWORKS INC | Technology | $269M | 0.02% |
79ASUR | ASURE SOFTWARE INC | Technology | $234M | 0.02% |
80IMMR | IMMERSION CORP | Technology | $220M | 0.02% |
81FIRY | FIRY INC | Technology | $130M | 0.01% |
82INSG | INSEEGO CORP | Technology | $122M | 0.01% |
83WYY | WIDEPOINT CORP | Technology | $115M | 0.01% |
84TCX | TUCOWS INC | Technology | $114M | 0.01% |
85STEM | STEM INC | Technology | $56M | 0.01% |
Full long-leg book as of July 2026 · cap-weighted · total market cap $1.11T. Hypothetical model holdings — not a registered fund’s portfolio.
Sector Breakdown
Portfolio Style
Size × value map of the long-leg book
Share of long-leg capital by market cap × book-to-market, using terciles of the 421-name universe at July 2026. Rows: Large ≥ $8.9B, Small < $1.9B. Columns: Value ≥ 0.63, Growth < 0.38 B/M. The dot marks the capital-weighted centroid of the book — 93% toward Large, 13% toward Growth. +2% unclassified (13 missing size/value). Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not realized P&L.
Capital-weighted centroid of the long leg, December 1998 → July 2026; the right-hand end is the same value as the box’s dot. 85 names now. Hypothetical holdings — descriptive, not P&L.
Constraint checks
How this book measures against the concentration and liquidity rules — as implemented here
These are UNCONSTRAINED factor sleeves: the construction pipeline sorts on a signal and cap-weights the top bucket, applying no issuer cap, no industry cap and no liquidity screen beyond the universe filter. A failing test therefore reports a constraint that was never applied during construction — it is not a defect in the strategy and not an error in the data. The same signal can be solved subject to these constraints.
7 independent checks plus 1 arithmetically implied by another check (RIC / IRC 851(b)(3)(A) 50% bucket), which is reported separately so the tally cannot overstate scrutiny.
1 of 7 checks could not be tested. Those are neither passes nor failures — they are gaps in what the data can answer, and they are excluded from the passed count above rather than folded into it.
With respect to 75% of total assets, no more than 5% may be invested in the securities of any one issuer.
Required>= 75.0%Actual58.6%Margin-16.4%No more than 25% of total assets may be invested in the securities of any one issuer.
Required<= 25.0%Actual32.9%Margin-7.9%
Engineering approximation of the cited rules for a DRAFT / HYPOTHETICAL model portfolio that is not a registered fund. This reports whether the portfolio passes the stated test AS IMPLEMENTED HERE; it is not a compliance opinion and is not a statement that any fund is compliant. Real filings need securities counsel.
No verdict sits within 1.0pp of its limit.
Data version — panel=20260719T025334 rows=2239262 asof=202607 issuers=20260719T014536 rates=20260804T224700
Measured on the 2026-07 formation date across 85 holdings (cap-weighted). A different formation date can produce different verdicts.
Derivatives risk (Rule 18f-4)
Whether this long-only book is subject to the VaR tests at all
This assessment describes the long-only book this fund holds — the top bucket only.
This fund QUALIFIES for the limited-derivatives-user exception, so it is excepted from the VaR tests; the ratio below is informational, not the operative limit.
Rule 18f-4(c)(4): a fund whose derivatives exposure (gross notional, including the value of assets sold short) is <= 10% of net assets is excepted from the VaR tests and the full derivatives risk management program.
No confidence interval: this follows from portfolio construction, not from an estimate.
Rule 18f-4(c)(2)(i): fund VaR at 99% over 20 trading days must not exceed 200% of the designated reference portfolio's VaR on the same basis.
Informational — does not governThis fund is excepted from the VaR tests, so the ratio below is context rather than the operative limit. It is shown because it is still a description of the book’s risk, not because it decides anything.
historical method · 331 monthly observations · about 3.3 in the 99% tail · paired percentile bootstrap over months
The estimators differ materially in value but agree on the verdict. Historical and Gaussian fund VaR differ by 17%; both still land on the same side of the 2x limit.
Engineering approximation of SEC Rule 18f-4 for research display. Not a compliance opinion and not a determination that any fund is compliant. Hypothetical model portfolio, not a registered fund.
The research long-short construction behind this factor does not qualify for this exception — a dollar-neutral book counts its full short notional, which is 100% of net assets against a 10% threshold. This product sidesteps that by holding the long leg alone, which is also why the long-leg Sharpe is reported separately throughout the site.
See the long-short verdict on the factor page →Since publication
Did the edge survive the paper coming out?
There is no “before” to compare against — the predictor was already public when our data begins, so every month shown is out-of-sample relative to the original study.
Split at January of the year after the factor was published. The post-publication stretch IS genuinely out-of-sample relative to the original study -- the predictor was public by then -- so it speaks to whether the effect survived being known. Nothing is fitted here, so this is performance SINCE PUBLICATION, not validation of a model. Note the 'pre' side is our data before publication (our panel starts ~1999), NOT the study's original in-sample period, which usually ran decades earlier; a decay figure compares before-vs-after within our sample and is not a comparison against the published result.
Consistency across eras
Is this record broadly durable, or one regime?
3-year rolling windows, stepping 1 year (26 windows). Dispersion is the spread of window Sharpes — higher means the record depends more on which era you look at.
Rules-based factors fit no parameters, so these windows are not out-of-sample tests and do not validate a fitted model. They show whether the factor's record is consistent across eras or driven by one regime.
Returns
Long leg is what this fund holds — long-short is shown for reference
| Period | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 1 yearcum. | 66.4% | 30.9% |
| 3 yearsp.a. | 34.3% | -8.3% |
| 5 yearsp.a. | 21.7% | -7.1% |
| 10 yearsp.a. | 19.1% | -10.9% |
| Since inceptionp.a. | 8.3% | -2.8% |
| Year | Long leg | Long-short |
|---|---|---|
| 20267 mo | 46.0% | 25.0% |
| 2025 | 30.0% | -6.1% |
| 2024 | 14.9% | -34.9% |
| 2023 | 37.9% | -33.3% |
| 2022 | -12.5% | 58.9% |
| 2021 | 22.7% | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 18.6% | -36.5% |
| 2019 | 31.5% | -5.9% |
| 2018 | -14.1% | -16.1% |
| 2017 | 16.2% | -24.4% |
| 2016 | 29.3% | 18.7% |
| 2015 | -9.1% | -5.3% |
| 2014 | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| 2013 | 61.4% | 16.9% |
| 2012 | -1.2% | -8.7% |
| 2011 | -16.2% | 10.3% |
| 2010 | 4.2% | -25.0% |
| 2009 | 56.0% | 13.1% |
| 2008 | -42.1% | 24.7% |
| 2007 | 2.0% | -20.9% |
| 2006 | 25.0% | 36.5% |
| 2005 | 1.4% | 3.0% |
| 2004 | 5.8% | 14.9% |
| 2003 | 40.9% | 0.2% |
| 2002 | -24.4% | 23.9% |
| 2001 | -14.5% | 39.8% |
| 2000 | -20.0% | 8.6% |
| 1999 | 14.0% | -55.1% |
Long leg = the top bucket this fund holds; long-short additionally shorts the bottom bucket and is not achievable in a long-only vehicle. Trailing figures run through July 2026: 1 year is a plain cumulative 12-month return (cum.), 3 years and longer are annualised (p.a.). Years marked with a month count are partial. These match the fact sheet’s tables by construction. Hypothetical backtest, gross of the placeholder expense ratio and trading costs — not investor results.
Fund Facts
Methodology
The Foundry Technology Leverage Factor ETF tracks a rules-based model that ranks Technology common stocks each month by a Leverage signal and holds the top quintile with the highest values. Signals are computed from point-in-time Sharadar fundamentals and total-return prices. The portfolio reconstitutes monthly and is cap-weighted within the long leg.
This is a hypothetical model portfolio for research display only — not a registered fund, not an offer, and not investment advice.
Documents (draft — hypothetical)
Auto-generated from the model’s metrics and current holdings. Every document is labeled DRAFT / hypothetical.
Objective, fees, strategy, and key risks.
Full strategy, model methodology, and risks.
Policies, construction, and governance.
One-page snapshot with top holdings.
Full current constituent list.
DRAFT — HYPOTHETICAL MODEL PORTFOLIO — NOT A REGISTERED FUND, NOT AN OFFER TO SELL SECURITIES, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE.